| 'El lobo' struggles for a foothold in the Southwest |
|
|
|
| Written by Greenwire | |
| Monday, 31 March 2008 | |
|
Ten years after its reintroduction, the Mexican gray wolf, the most genetically distinct species of gray wolf in
The wolf has been on the endangered species list since 1976, and it vanished from the wild during the following decade. Its current wild population is derived entirely from a group of 300 animals held and bred in captivity. The 300, progeny of an original group of five that was captured in But it is what happens to the wolves after release that many consider the biggest problem. Worried about conflicts with the politically influential ranching community in the Southwest, FWS has determined that wolves beyond their designated Blue Range Recovery Area -- 9,290 square miles -- are to be relocated, and any wolves that come into conflict with livestock are to be permanently removed. FWS recognizes that the removal policy is not working, but the groups managing the wolf's recovery -- including the Forest Service, the White Mountain Apache Tribe, and New Mexico's and Arizona's Game and Fish departments -- lack consensus on a workable alternative, according to FWS spokesman Brian Millsap. Currently, the wolves' numbers are unimpressive. While an independent scientific panel has determined that the recovery area could easily support 250 animals, and possibly as many as 468, a recent survey shows the current population to be only 52 and include only four breeding pairs. For many ranchers, who are compensated for any verified livestock losses due to wolves, that's 52 too many. "I'd really like to see them gone," said Barbara Marks, who chairs the Arizona Cattle Growers' Association's wildlife committee and operates a cattle ranch with her husband that includes 225 acres of private property and 71,775 acres of public land. "In the middle of the night, you wake up in a cold sweat when you hear your dogs barking, wondering if something's wrong." But while officials do not release into the wild any wolf that lacks a genetic duplicate in captivity, a number of scientists raising Mexican wolves in zoos argue that officials should declare a moratorium on killing the animals in the Blue Range Recovery Area because it is undercutting the wild population's genetic diversity. John Horning of advocacy group WildEarth Guardians said that while scientists have a workable plan for the wolf's complete reintroduction, "we are really facing the second extinction of the Mexican gray wolf in the wild" (Juliet Eilperin, Washington Post, March 31).
Set as favorite
Bookmark
Email This
Comments (0)
![]() Write comment
|
|
| Last Updated ( Tuesday, 01 April 2008 ) |
Related Items
- Wyoming officials, enviros question wolf delisting plan
- Rockies wolf population reached 1,300 in 2006
- Wolf impact remains in dispute
- Northern Rockies' gray wolves to lose federal protection
- As FWS delists gray wolf population in Rockies, enviro groups prepare lawsuits
- Count shows elk pushing north out of Yellowstone
- Northern Rockies Gray Wolf Delisted
- Delisting of wolves raises hackles
- Wolves: State management plans get mixed reviews
- WOLVES: Conservation groups sue FWS over delisting
- How many wolves? Lawsuit says original target was too small by sevenfold
- Wolf-kill total reaches 16
- Idaho wildlife officials hear from both sides of wolf issue
- Wyoming argues against wolf relisting
- Idaho sets wolf limits, Statewide hunting Season
- Wolf management best controlled by states
- Gray wolves in cross hairs as big game season approaches
- Wolves may be returning to Washington state
- Wolf population shrinks
- Don't call plugging wolves hunting
- Gray wolves get back their endangered species status, for now.
- Oregon confirms wolf pack
- Foes of wolf protections discuss strategy
- Senate panel approves federal pay for wolf kills
- Justice Department asks court to relist wolves
- Reintroduction proposed for southern Rockies








