|
Human-caused climate change is responsible for up to 60 percent of
observed changes in river flow, snowpack and winter air temperatures in
the western United States over the last 50 years, according to a study
published online today by the journal Science. Water managers
in the West should integrate future climate change into plans for water
infrastructure projects, researchers involved in the study note.
"Our results are not good news for those living in the western
United States," write the study's authors, who used a combination of
water and climate models to tease out what has driven significant
changes in the region's hydrological cycle since 1950.
The
researchers found human-caused emissions of heat-trapping greenhouse
gases and aerosols to be major factors in the Western water cycle -- a
result that surprised them, said lead author Tim Barnett, a
climatologist at the Scripps Institution of Oceanography.
"When
we started this project, I was leery we'd have success because the
natural variability of the climate in the western U.S. is big," Barnett
said. "We have droughts and wet periods that go way back through
history."
But only when the researchers included GHG and
aerosol emissions in their climate models did the simulations
accurately reconstruct the river flow, snowpack and winter air
temperature changes observed over the last half-century, from 1950-1999.
They estimate that human-caused climate change began having a noticeable impact on the region in the mid-1980s.
"It's
pretty clear it's not natural variability," Barnett said, noting that
the researchers tested and ruled out the influence of solar variation,
volcanic emissions and precipitation patterns.
The study
comes on the heels of the latest report of the Intergovernmental Panel
on Climate Change, released last year, that predicted in the western
United States there is a 90 percent chance that climate change will
lead to "decreased snowpack, more winter flooding and reduced summer
flows, exacerbating competition for over-allocated water resources"
from agricultural power, residential and recreational sectors (Greenwire, April 17, 2007).
Given
the earlier work, the new study is "not a terribly surprising result,"
said Chris Milly, a research hydrologist with the U.S. Geological
Survey who said he agreed with Barnett's approach but would have liked
to see more climate models used. "Warming there [in the West] and
throughout the world is getting large enough that it's beginning to
peak out above natural variability even on regional scales, not just
global."
But what is notable is that Barnett's study is
one of the first to try to figure out just how large an influence
humans are having on the West's water cycle, said Milly, also the lead
author of a policy essay that appears in tomorrow's print edition of Science.
Impact on water managers
The essay's authors -- all
hydrologists -- argue that water managers must factor future climate
change into plans for water infrastructure projects, which accounts for
about $500 billion in global spending each year.
Past
observations of streamflow, runoff, precipitation and snowpack are
likely not a reliable base for planners looking to invest in new
infrastructure, they conclude, recommending that planners discard the
long-held concept of "stationarity," which the essay defines as "the
idea that natural systems fluctuate within an unchanging envelope of
variability."
In short, "if you're planning a project now
that has to last 50 years, you have to look ahead at what the climate
is going to be then," Milly told Land Letter. Even in regions
where it may not be apparent now that warming is affecting water
resources, climate is likely to become a factor in coming decades, he
added.
But the mechanics of following the essay's recommendation to consider climate in planning may prove difficult.
"More
communication between the scientific community and planners can be
beneficial," Milly said. "The difficulty is in figuring out how does
that communication occur? ... How do scientists give information that
is meaningful to the planners?"
|