| Stillwater Good Neighbor Agreement |
|
|
|
Objective: The legally binding Good Neighbor Agreement sets measurable goals and establishes a means for citizens to participate in oversight and decisions about Stillwater Mining Company (SMC) operations that could impact the local communities, economy and environment. To minimize future litigation, the agreement provides for open lines of communication between local citizen groups and the mine for resolving disputes. Participants: Stillwater Protective Association, Cottonwood Resource Council, The Northern Plains Resource Council, Stillwater Mining Company. History: A bucolic, sparsely populated landscape stretches across south-central Montana, where the Boulder and Stillwater Rivers rush from high mountain ranges to meander through rolling ranchlands. It's where the Stillwater Mining Company bores into the northern flank of the Beartooth Mountains for palladium, a metal used in automobile catalytic converters.
The Stillwater Protective Association (SPA), a group of local ranchers and conservationists, filed suit against Montana's environmental regulatory agency after it issued a permit allowing expanded mining operations. In the neighboring county, SPA's sister group, the Cottonwood Resource Council (CRC), geared up to challenge a proposed discharge permit for the East Boulder River at SMC's other mine site. Both organizations are affiliates of Northern Plains Resource Council, a statewide family agriculture and conservation group. Through Northern Plains, CRC and SPA brought media and public pressure to bear on the company, urging to come to the table and "be a good neighbor." These actions set in motion nearly a year of bumpy negotiations between the mine and three conservation groups that wanted the mine to operate under greener standards. All sides were able to hammer out a legally binding agreement that was signed in the spring of 2000. Key providions in the Stillwater Good Neighbor Agreement include:
By 2004, the parties had completed all of the goals set forth in the agreement and decided that an update was needed to establish new goals based on current management practices. The update took the form of an amendment to the agreement, referred to as the "2005 Amendment." Accomplishments: The Stillwater Good Neighbor Agreement is unique in that it's the only one of its kind between a local community and a hardrock mine. The agreement outlines a framework for involving the local communities in monitoring the mine's impacts. One of the most cited accomplishments of the agreement has been the citizen water quality monitoring program for the East Boulder and Stillwater Rivers. Other accomplishments of the Good Neighbor Agreement include safer roads through a comprehensive traffic reduction plan; citizen access to information through audits of the mine's compliance with clean water and air laws, independant reviews, and an open-door policy between the mine and community; better protections for clean air and water through a baseline water quality study and strict water pollution limits; protection for open space through over 2,220 acres of conservation easements; pilot testing and field study of innovative new technologies to address mine waste tailings; and a volunteer, citizen-based water sampling system to monitor water quality of the East Boulder and Stillwater watersheds. The renegotiated agreement through the 2005 Amendment also resulted in major benefits, for the mine and the community. The amendment included water management plans for both mines that ensure that 90% of pollutants are treated for the duration of mining operations. Over the next three years the company will further optimize water management practices to reach as close to zero discharge of pollutants as is technically possible. The agreement also included a provision for the independent review of the company's performance bonds (a financial assurance deposit) and reclamation plans every five years. Most other key components of the Good Neighbor Agreement remain the same. Challenges/Constraints: Maintaining community involvement in the Good Neighbor Agreement and the various committees involed in negotiations has been challenging. Volunteers spend between twenty and sixty hours a month keeping up to date on all the various aspects of the agreement, including operating permints and water monitoring. As a result of the work involved, it has been difficult to keep unpaid volunteers engaged. A Russian company, Norilsk Nickel, has acquired a majority stake in the stock of the company. At the time of the acquisition, mine officials said that the Russian company's purchase would bring financial stability and wouldn't disrupt the principles outlined in the Good Neighbor Agreement. While the Northern Plains Resource Council initially adopted a wait-and-see stance, concerned that Russian environmental and labor standards have historically been considerably less rigorous than U.S. standards, so far the agreement and the standards have not been affected by the change. According to Sarah Zuzulock, a technical specialist involved in implementing the agreement, making the agreement legally binding and including a requirement for alternative dispute resolution (ADR) processes before any of the parties can back out has been very a very important component in the success and continued implementation of the agreement. "Having ADR in the agreement keeps people at the table," Zuzulock said. For mor information see: Billings Gazette Story Northern Plains Resource Council Stillwater Mining
Set as favorite
Bookmark
Email This
Comments (0)
![]() Write comment
You must be logged in to a comment. Please register if you do not have an account yet.
|
|||||
| Last Updated ( Tuesday, 21 October 2008 ) | |||||
Related Items
- Control over roads in parks, wilderness increasingly a court issue
- Senators address reform of 1872 hardrock law with their own bill
- Full Senate could add enviro protections to hardrock bill, says Cantwell
- Slow pace in Senate frustrates hardrock reform advocates
- Hunters, fishers outline habitat protection goals in reform of hardrock law
- Senate panel examines uranium claims, abandoned mine lands
- Groups want reform law to curb Grand Canyon claims
- Settlement blocks uranium project near Grand Canyon
- House approves Rahall's hardrock reform bill, 244-166
- Hardrock reform to meet seven amendments on floor
- Ariz. lawmaker floats bill to ban uranium projects near Grand Canyon
- Hardrock reform to meet seven amendments on floor
- Federal judge clears way for CBM drilling in Colorado mountains
- Coal Tattoo Blog
- B.C. miner wins powerful champion in Idaho to open cobalt mine
- Company's coal lease in SE Montana puts pressure on state
- Groups ask Utah mine board to stop proposed coal mine
- EPA finds uranium from polluted mine in Nev. wells
- Interior floats proposals for changing stream buffer rule
- Colorado lawmakers to EPA: Get public input on uranium mine
- Senate committee OKs Arizona land swap
- Approval for Utah's first coal strip mine moves ahead
- Montana board votes 4-1 to lease coal tracts
- Utah county's stance on coal mine appears to bite hand that feeds it
- Mining reform picks up steam in Congress
- Mining reform picks up steam in Congress
- Mining reform picks up steam in Congress
- Last week at Interior
- USFWS proposes to expand bull trout habitat in 5 Western states
- Colorado takes public comment on new uranium mining rules
- Nuclear-power officials vow to mine uranium "the right way"
- Federal appeals court hears Wyoming roadless lawsuit
- EPA says NRC must evaluate Wyoming uranium mines for water impact
- Federal judge blocks mine beneath Montana wilderness
- Environmental groups criticize Obama on mine waste, offshore drilling
- Colorado developer buys mining claims, curbs access near Telluride
- BLM proposes selling Idaho land needed for phosphate mine
- Colo. mine is highly productive, dangerous
- USFS again delays Arizona mine review
- EPA says uranium mine near Grand Canyon operating without approval
- Citing 1872 mining law, Vilsack OKs 'roadless area' projects
- Are mine sites the future of solar?
- USDA OKs 14 projects in roadless areas in 5 Western states
- EPA To Take Public Comments On Large Surface Mine Project
- Permit Hearing Evolves into Mountaintop Mining Debate
- USFS takes public comment on Montana mine's drilling request
- Montana sees gold in mine reclamation project near Yellowstone
- Cotter Corp. to begin cleanup at Colorado uranium mine in July
- Churchrock is not ‘Indian Country’ Court Rules in Favor of Uranium Mining Company
- Lolo forest seeks comment on reclaiming mines in drainage
- Both proponents, opponents of uranium mining will voice opinions
- Report: Climate change to have major impacts on Western water
- Mining group sues U.S. over mountaintop permit 'guidance'
- Cleanup plan for CdA Basin shifts focus from soil to water





