Wyoming judge turns back request to block Clinton roadless rule PDF Print E-mail
A federal judge in Cheyenne, Wyo., rejected today Wyoming's request to enjoin the Clinton-era Roadless Area Conservation Rule prohibiting logging, roadbuilding and other development on 50 million acres of national forest.


Wyoming had asked Senior Judge Clarence Brimmer to reinstate his 2003 nationwide injunction against the Clinton rule, a move that would have placed the Forest Service between two federal judges. The Bush administration used the 2003 injunction as cover in an attempt to replace the rule.

Last September, Magistrate Judge Elizabeth Laporte in San Francisco struck down a Bush administration state petition plan and reinstated the Clinton roadless rule. Laporte has also prohibited the Forest Service from taking any action, such as approving oil and gas drilling permits, that would violate the Clinton rule.

Brimmer ruled against Wyoming, saying he precluded from enjoining the rule on procedural grounds. But the judge expressed unhappiness with the circumstances.

"This court is extremely perplexed how the California court could resurrect the Clinton roadless rule," Brimmer wrote. "The Clinton Roadless Rule did not comply with NEPA and this court held it invalid" in 2003.

Brimmer added he is "troubled and questions the authority of the California court to raise this rule back to life."

The Bush administration, which has opposed the Clinton rule since January 2001, opposed Wyoming's motion on procedural grounds, along with environmental groups. Because the administration formally acted to replace the Clinton rule in mid-2005, the 10th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals vacated Brimmer's decision as a matter of legal course. If Brimmer reinstates his 2003 decision, it would violate the 10th Circuit's order, the Justice Department argues (Greenwire, April 17).

In the interim, the Agriculture Department is processing petitions from state governors who wish to craft individual roadless rules for national forests in their states. A USDA committee is scheduled to consider Colorado's petition next week.
Comments (0)Add Comment

Write comment
You must be logged in to a comment. Please register if you do not have an account yet.

busy