| Lawsuit prompts BLM study on drilling's effects on water |
|
|
|
| Written by KATIE HOWELL, Land Letter | |
| Friday, 12 September 2008 | |
|
Environmentalists will soon have solid scientific evidence about the
effects of coalbed methane drilling on drinking water, streams and
aquifers in the Rocky Mountains now that the Bureau of Land Management
and National Academy of Sciences have entered into an agreement to
pursue a study.
Spurred by a lawsuit brought on in February by WildEarth Guardians, the Sierra Club and Rocky Mountain Clean Air Action, the agencies formalized an agreement in late August to study the effects of coalbed methane drilling on water resources in the West, something environmentalists have been urging for some time. "Whenever questions are raised [about the effects of coalbed methane drilling on water], they are often met with ridicule by industry, who says there's no science to prove anything one way or the other," said Jeremy Nichols, the climate and energy program director for WildEarth Guardians. "We think that's an inappropriate response. The lack of information does not mean there is no reason for concern." The February lawsuit prompted BLM and NAS to meet in Denver in April 2008 to discuss the study (Land Letter, April 17). That meeting ultimately resulted in the recent study agreement, which officially starts Oct. 15 and could cost as much as $560,960 for the up to 21-month study, according to the agreement. The study was required by the 2005 federal energy bill, which gave BLM and NAS one year to enter into a study agreement. When the agencies had still done nothing three years later, the environmental groups filed the lawsuit. After the formal agreement was made Aug. 28, the groups dropped the lawsuit. "Obviously, there are lots of concerns about coalbed methane drilling's effects to groundwater, surface water and drinking water supplies. But there was nothing comprehensive," Nichols said. "We think we're going to get that as a result of this study." U.S. EPA is also involved with the research. That agency announced plans earlier this week to review water pollution guidelines for coalbed methane extraction as well as coal-fired power plants and unused pharmaceuticals (E&ENews PM, Sept. 8). The NAS study, to be conducted by the National Research Council, will examine hydraulic, geologic and water quality data as well as production techniques, costs and the impacts to surface water and groundwater, according to the agreement contract and the National Research Council's statement of task. The study will also consolidate existing state and federal research about coalbed methane drilling's effects on water resources, including EPA research. Coalbed methane is natural gas trapped within shallow coal seams, according to the U.S. Geological Survey. It can be extracted from coal and used as an additional coal-based energy resource. But extraction requires dewatering of coal seams, which could contaminate water. That water is then discarded in streams or reinjected into the ground. The dewatering process can also dry up streams and water wells, according to WildEarth Guardians. But USGS estimates the United States could hold more than 700 trillion cubic feet of coalbed methane reserves, making it an important energy resource. In 2006, coalbed methane accounted for 9.4 percent of all natural gas production in the United States. "This [study] may change the way we drill in the Rocky Mountain West," Nichols said. BLM did not provide comment on the study by press time.
Set as favorite
Bookmark
Email This
Comments (0)
![]() Write comment
|
|
| Last Updated ( Friday, 12 September 2008 ) |
Related Items
- Muddy Creek Coordinated Resource Management Project
- Bureau of Land Management
- Water an issue in energy development in New Mexico basin
- As EPA approves new Mont. water standards, effects to Wyo. industry feared
- Analysis shows proximity of hardrock claims to cities
- Colo. officials decry BLM decision on Roan drilling
- EPA proposes strategy for water quality, quantity
- Feds, Utah regulators study cleanup efforts for Superfund sites
- Feds look at drilling's effects on water
- Rancher questions Tongue water quality
- Excess pumping may have hurt foundering fish population -- investigation
- BLM sets grouse protection zone
- Enviros blast BLM approval of gas drilling in Utah landmark with lawsuit
- BLM plan says energy development is priority
- Removing roads key to keeping Portland's water source clean
- BLM office in N.M. explores using CBM water for reclamation
- Will public-lands rules be changed?
- BLM plan draws anti-grazing protest
- BLM allows protests of plan to triple logging in western Ore.
- Navajos to run program protecting groundwater
- Bush’s parting moves on the environment
- A new direction for Interior under Obama
- Obama looks to undo Utah drilling decisions
- Montana says methane producer's discharge water failing tests
- Enviro groups sue BLM over oil and gas industry emissions
- Moab mayor plans to protest BLM's planned lease sale
- BLM issues final rule for shale development
- In Waning Hours, Bush Administration Fortifies Oil Shale Industry
- BLM unseals plan for 1.8M acres near Monticello
- EPA construction-site discharge rule would implement sediment control practices
- Utah lands bill dead for now
- Few changes in final EIS on Western energy corridors
- The fight: Uranium drilling at Canyon
- Groups press fight over Utah/Nevada border resources
- Utah parks may yet escape oil drilling
- Interior alters land-use plans to allow shale development
- Greens fear last push by Bush



